|
Notes |
|
|
(0001659)
|
|
Kry
|
|
2005-12-14 04:35
|
|
|
Wa, poisoning aMule with eMul+? |
|
|
|
(0001669)
|
|
lao
|
|
2005-12-14 13:08
|
|
More like sweetening, really.
The eMule+ code base is older and has seen a lot more development,
plus it has a greater user base. So it's just to be expected that there are
a lot of non-essential but helpful features in it which would also benefit
aMule users. |
|
|
|
(0001694)
|
|
Kry
|
2005-12-17 11:11
(edited on: 2005-12-17 11:12) |
|
Sorry, but eMule+ code has seen way less development than aMule's one, and it's not older, it's newer.
Oh, and I like my userbase more than e+ one :P
edited on: 12-17-05 11:12 |
|
|
|
(0001695)
|
|
lao
|
|
2005-12-17 15:21
|
|
The emule+ code base is a fork of the original (emule) client, which pre-dates the xmule/amule, but came after mldonkey.
But that's just my memory. And I don't know any great details about any of these projects. So I very well may be off.
I was of course speaking of both eMule and eMulePlus. This feature is also found in the "official" emule client, and probably was there before the fork, though I can't verify that. Since the changes get merged back and forth between the mods it's rather a moot point anyway.
I still believe that with a greater user base they will see more feature requests and (most likely) more requests for features which are quite sensible and useful to many people (like this one :).
I don't think that's a bad thing.. |
|