Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2024-10-31 08:18 CET |
My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0000430 | aMule | Transfer | public | 2005-05-12 20:42 | 2005-07-15 00:32 | ||||
Reporter | GhePeU | ||||||||
Assigned To | Kry | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | always | ||||
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | 2.0.0 | ||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | SVN | |||||||
Summary | 0000430: Sources order by priority/status | ||||||||
Description | With amule 2.0.0 ordering sources by priority and status is sub-optimal. A4AF sources now are always first, and if a file has got many A4AF it is necessary scroll down many pages before you can see the first "good" sources. is this intentional? it would be better, imho, if A4AF are listed AFTER all the other sources, so you can see immediately sources with a low QR, that are likely the ones you'll download from in the following minutes/hours. | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Fixed in Revision | |||||||||
Operating System | |||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
Notes | |
(0000988) Kry (manager) 2005-05-20 02:19 |
Will look into it... eventually. |
(0000990) GhePeU (reporter) 2005-05-20 10:00 |
well, I submitted this bug report because the behaviour changed in the last weeks. The actual behaviour is very annoying, if you are used to check sources. For example, ad the moment I'm downloading two files with many sources in common, and this means that each one has got 0000090:0000250 A4AF sources. One of them has got 7 active sources, and if I want to see who are the client I'm downloading from, which chunk and how many MB they transfer to me at what speed (all informations useful to estimate the future trend of the download) I have to scroll down page and page with only useless white bars with A4AF on them before I can see something. |
(0001005) Kry (manager) 2005-05-26 07:09 |
Current CVS should fit your needs. All NNP/QueueFull/A4AF are now sorted AFTER the higher QR ones. |
(0001088) GhePeU (reporter) 2005-06-19 10:21 |
I'm sorry, I just noticed that the behaviour is not changed in 2.0.3 release. |
(0001093) Kry (manager) 2005-06-21 00:17 |
CVS != 2.0.3 |
(0001096) GhePeU (reporter) 2005-06-21 01:42 |
http://www.amule.org/wiki/index.php/Changelog_2.0.2 [^] Kry: * Fixed 0000430: "Sources order by priority/status" |
(0001135) Xaignar (manager) 2005-07-15 00:32 |
On current CVS, the A4AF items are now last when sorted ascending and first when sorted descending. You can grab yourself a CVS snapshot and verify that this is correct. Cheers, Xaignar |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2005-05-12 20:42 | GhePeU | New Issue | |
2005-05-20 02:14 | Kry | Status | new => assigned |
2005-05-20 02:14 | Kry | Assigned To | => Kry |
2005-05-20 02:19 | Kry | Note Added: 0000988 | |
2005-05-20 02:19 | Kry | Status | assigned => acknowledged |
2005-05-20 10:00 | GhePeU | Note Added: 0000990 | |
2005-05-26 07:09 | Kry | Status | acknowledged => resolved |
2005-05-26 07:09 | Kry | Fixed in Version | => CVS |
2005-05-26 07:09 | Kry | Resolution | open => fixed |
2005-05-26 07:09 | Kry | Note Added: 0001005 | |
2005-06-19 10:21 | GhePeU | Status | resolved => feedback |
2005-06-19 10:21 | GhePeU | Resolution | fixed => reopened |
2005-06-19 10:21 | GhePeU | Note Added: 0001088 | |
2005-06-21 00:17 | Kry | Note Added: 0001093 | |
2005-06-21 01:42 | GhePeU | Note Added: 0001096 | |
2005-07-15 00:32 | Xaignar | Status | feedback => resolved |
2005-07-15 00:32 | Xaignar | Resolution | reopened => fixed |
2005-07-15 00:32 | Xaignar | Note Added: 0001135 |
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |