| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2025-12-08 14:58 CET | |
| My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
| 0000706 | aMule | External Conn | public | 2005-12-09 05:01 | 2008-07-14 15:19 | ||||
| Reporter | Jacobo221 | ||||||||
| Assigned To | Xaignar | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | ||||
| Status | closed | Resolution | open | ||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
| Product Version | |||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
| Summary | 0000706: wrong id status | ||||||||
| Description | For reporting the ID of another client (details) it does the folowing check in ClientDetailDialog.cpp: (m_client->HasLowID() ? _("LowID"):_("HighID") It should check if m_nUserIDHybrid == 0. Otherwise, in some cases it will show, wrongly, "High ID": *Not yet identified clients *Kademlia-only users | ||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
| Fixed in Revision | |||||||||
| Operating System | |||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0001610) Kry (manager) 2005-12-09 23:35 |
Assuming lowid on non-identifies is as wrong as assuming highid. And there is no such "kademlia-only client". |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2005-12-09 05:01 | Jacobo221 | New Issue | |
| 2005-12-09 23:34 | Kry | Status | new => assigned |
| 2005-12-09 23:34 | Kry | Assigned To | => Kry |
| 2005-12-09 23:35 | Kry | Status | assigned => closed |
| 2005-12-09 23:35 | Kry | Note Added: 0001610 | |
| 2005-12-09 23:45 | Xaignar | Status | closed => assigned |
| 2005-12-09 23:45 | Xaignar | Assigned To | Kry => Xaignar |
| 2008-07-14 15:19 | Wuischke | Status | assigned => closed |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2025 MantisBT Team |
 |