0000726: Statistics: free space vs needed space

Notes
(0001659) Kry (manager) 2005-12-14 04:35	Wa, poisoning aMule with eMul+?

(0001669) lao (reporter) 2005-12-14 13:08	More like sweetening, really. The eMule+ code base is older and has seen a lot more development, plus it has a greater user base. So it's just to be expected that there are a lot of non-essential but helpful features in it which would also benefit aMule users.

(0001694) Kry (manager) 2005-12-17 11:11 edited on: 2005-12-17 11:12	Sorry, but eMule+ code has seen way less development than aMule's one, and it's not older, it's newer. Oh, and I like my userbase more than e+ one :P edited on: 12-17-05 11:12

(0001695) lao (reporter) 2005-12-17 15:21	The emule+ code base is a fork of the original (emule) client, which pre-dates the xmule/amule, but came after mldonkey. But that's just my memory. And I don't know any great details about any of these projects. So I very well may be off. I was of course speaking of both eMule and eMulePlus. This feature is also found in the "official" emule client, and probably was there before the fork, though I can't verify that. Since the changes get merged back and forth between the mods it's rather a moot point anyway. I still believe that with a greater user base they will see more feature requests and (most likely) more requests for features which are quite sensible and useful to many people (like this one :). I don't think that's a bad thing..